Author Name : Mohammed A. Alnafea
1 Assessment of Occupational Exposure Among Diagnostic Radiology Workers in King Faisal Medical Complex in Taif City - Saudi Arabia
- Mohammed A. Alnafea* ,
- Emad Alamri ,
- Mahmood Abd-Alalim ,
- Osama Albedaiwi ,
- Abdulaziz Alamri
- Abstract
- Show Article
- Download : 969
- Google Citation
- Journal DOI : 10.5281/zenodo.10002953
- Certificate
Abstract : ABSTRACT
Radiographic imaging is extremely valuable as a diagnostic tool in medicine, but ionizing radiation poses hazards for health-care providers as well as patients in health-care facilities (HCFs). Occupational radiation exposure can occur due to various human activities, including the use of radiation in medicine. Radiation exposure from diagnostic X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan carry well-known potential risks. Personnel and radiation safety monitoring is an important safety precaution in the practice of radiography. The study aimed to assess the occupational radiation exposure and safety protection among medical staff in HCFs in the Eastern Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This study compares the occupational radiation dose levels for all radiation workers in King Faisal Medical Complex in Taif City of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia over four years. The occupational exposure was quantified using thermoluminescence dosimeters. The study results concludes that the occupational radiation doses to all workers during the four years period were below the limits set by the ICRP recommendations. The measured annual effective doses for workers were found to be 0.39 mSv.
Keywords: Radiation Dose; Dose limits; Occupational exposure; Personal dosimetry; Radiology; TLD.
Keyword : Radiation Dose; Dose limits; Occupational exposure; Personal dosimetry; Radiology; TLD.
2 Experimental Breast Phantom studies for Estimation of Breast Tumor Using Ultrasound and Mammography Imaging Systems
- Mohammed A. Alnafea* ,
- Samar A Lanazi ,
- Rana H. Aldahlawi
- Abstract
- Show Article
- Download : 183
- Certificate
Abstract : ABSTRACT
Mammography, the standard method for breast cancer screening, misses many cancers, especially in women with dense breast. Whole-breast ultrasonography has been advocated to supplement digital mammography to improve outcomes. The main purpose of this study was to determine early breast tumour detection by assessing the performance of breast ultrasonography compared with X-ray mammography. We compared the performance and diagnostic yield of mammography alone versus ultrasound. The main objective was to investigate is ultrasound a viable method for early breast cancer detection. Breast Elastography phantom was used in this study as a method for comparison between both imaging modalities. We examine the detection capabilities of both imaging systems through visual visulisation of tumor and measureing the full-width at half maximum (FWHM). The imaging setup were optimized for small tumors using ultrasound and X-ray mammography imaging systems. In mammography, breast compression is applied to reduce the thickness of the breast phantom. The experimental results demonstrate the validity of using high-resolution ultrasound as complementry method for both screening and diagnostic mammography. For such phantom ultrasound is a more sensitive and accurate modality compared to digital mammography.
Keywords: Mammography, US, Breast cancer; tumor detection
Keyword : Mammography, US, Breast cancer; tumor detection
Login
Loading....
Author Guideline
Copyright Form
News Update
Archive List
- Volume-11
- Volume-10
- January 2023 Issue 1
- January 2023 Issue 1
- February 2023 Issue 2
- March 2023 Issue 3
- March 2023 Issue 3
- April 2023 Issue 4
- April 2023 Issue 4
- May 2023 Issue 5
- May 2023 Issue 5
- May 2023 Issue 5
- June 2023 Issue 6
- June 2023 Issue 6
- July 2023 Issue 7
- July 2023 Issue 7
- August 2023 Issue 8
- August 2023 Issue 8
- September 2023 Issue 9
- October 2023 Issue 10
- November 2023 Issue 11
- December 2023 Issue 12
- Volume-9
- January 2022 Issue 1
- February 2022 Issue 2
- March 2022 Issue 3
- April 2022 Issue 4
- May 2022 Issue 5
- June 2022 Issue 6
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- August 2022 Issue 8
- September 2022 Issue 9
- October 2022 Issue 10
- October 2022 Issue 10
- November 2022 Issue 11
- November 2022 Issue 11
- November 2022 Issue 11
- December 2022 Issue 12
- Volume-8
- January 2021 Issue 1
- February 2021 Issue 2
- February 2021 Issue 2
- March 2021 Issue 3
- April 2021 Issue 4
- May 2021 Issue 5
- June 2021 Issue 6
- June 2021 Issue 6
- June 2021 Issue 6
- July 2021 Issue 7
- August 2021 Issue 8
- September 2021 Issue 9
- October 2021 Issue 10
- November 2021 Issue 11
- December 2021 Issue 12
- Volume-7
- January 2020 Issue 1
- January 2020 Issue 1
- February 2020 Issue 2
- March 2020 Issue 3
- March 2020 Issue 3
- March 2020 Issue 3
- April 2020 Issue 4
- April 2020 Issue 4
- May 2020 Issue 5
- May 2020 Issue 5
- May 2020 Issue 5
- June 2020 Issue 6
- June 2020 Issue 6
- June 2020 Issue 6
- July 2020 Issue 7
- August 2020 Issue 8
- September 2020 Issue 9
- October 2020 Issue 10
- November 2020 Issue 11
- December 2020 Issue 12
- December 2020 Issue 12
- Volume-6
- January 2019 Issue 1
- February 2019 Issue 2
- March 2019 Issue 3
- April 2019 Issue 4
- April 2019 Issue 4
- May 2019 Issue 5
- May 2019 Issue 5
- June 2019 Issue 6
- June 2019 Issue 6
- July 2019 Issue 7
- July 2019 Issue 7
- August 2019 Issue 8
- September 2019 Issue 9
- September 2019 Issue 9
- September 2019 Issue 9
- October 2019 Issue 10
- November 2019 Issue 11
- November 2019 Issue 11
- November 2019 Issue 11
- December 2019 Issue 12
- Volume-5
- January 2018 Issue 1
- January 2018 Issue 1
- February 2018 Issue 2
- March 2018 Issue 3
- April 2018 Issue 4
- May 2018 Issue 5
- June 2018 Issue 6
- July 2018 Issue 7
- August 2018 Issue 8
- September 2018 Issue 9
- September 2018 Issue 9
- October 2018 Issue 10
- October 2018 Issue 10
- November 2018 Issue 11
- December 2018 Issue 12
- December 2018 Issue 12
- Volume-4
- January 2017 Issue 1
- February 2017 Issue 2
- February 2017 Issue 2
- March 2017 Issue 3
- April 2017 Issue 4
- April 2017 Issue 4
- May 2017 Issue 5
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- July 2017 Issue 7
- August 2017 Issue 8
- August 2017 Issue 8
- September 2017 Issue 9
- October 2017 Issue 10
- November 2017 Issue 11
- December 2017 Issue 12
- December 2017 Issue 12
- December 2017 Issue 12
- Volume-3
- January 2016 Issue 1
- February 2016 Issue 2
- March 2016 Issue 3
- April 2016 Issue 4
- May 2016 Issue 5
- June 2016 Issue 6
- June 2016 Issue 6
- July 2016 Issue 7
- July 2016 Issue 7
- July 2016 Issue 7
- August 2016 Issue 8
- September 2016 Issue 9
- October 2016 Issue 10
- October 2016 Issue 10
- November 2016 Issue 11
- November 2016 Issue 11
- December 2016 Issue 12
- Volume-2
- Volume-1
Statastics
Download of Articles
101,591