e-ISSN: 2394-2967
logo

British Journal of Medical and Health Research

Published

STUDY ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT AT A PRIVATE CORPORATE HOSPITAL

Published in September 2016 Issue 9 (Vol. 3, Issue 9, 2016)

STUDY ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT AT A PRIVATE CORPORATE HOSPITAL - Issue cover

Abstract

BACKGROUND Drug is a double edged sword, despite its benefits, is been always associated with adverse experiences. We conducted a Questionnaire Survey on role of healthcare professionals in detecting, reporting and documenting adverse drug reactions. METHODS A self-administered Questionnaire Survey was conducted to know the attitude, knowledge and practice oriented issues prevailing among the study site and among the healthcare professionals. Patients admitted to General Medicine Department over a period of 9 months were assessed for ADRs through daily ward visit by the pharmacist. A total of 51 ADRs were identified in 3722 general medicine ward admissions during the study period. RESULTS Severity of the suspected ADRs assessed using Modified Hartwig and Siegel Scale, revealed that 4(7.8%) suspected ADRs were severe, 27 (52.94%) ADRs were moderate and 20 (39.21%) ADRs were mild in severity. The study revealed that 29 (56.8%) ADRs were possibly drug-related, whereas 17 (33.33%) were classified as probably or definitely related to the drug and 22(43.13%) ADRs were possibly drug-related, 16(31.41%) ADRs were probably drug-related, whereas 11(21.56%) were classified as certainly related to drug on assessment with Naranjo and WHO scale.12 patients (23.52%) were admitted due to an Adverse Drug Reaction compared to 39(76.47%) who were affected by ADR after hospital admission. The majority (40%) of patients who suffered from ADRs were above 60 years. System most commonly affected were Dermatological in -15(29.41%) patients, Gastrointestinal in 13 (25.49%) patients, CNS in 8(15.68%) patients, followed by Cardiovascular in 2 (3.92%) patients. The drug class mostly associated with ADR was Antibiotics in 16(31.3%) cases, followed by NSAID in 8(15.68%). In 41 (80.34%) cases the drug was withdrawn, dose altered in 7(15.6%) and no change was made in 3(5.8%) patients. Adverse reactions encountered were treated and the final outcome was measured. About 43(84.3%) patients recovered, while in 7(13.7%) cases the ADRs decreased. One fatal case was reported. CONCLUSION The study strongly suggests that there is greater need for streamlining of hospital based ADR reporting and monitoring system to create awareness and to promote the reporting of ADR among healthcare professionals of the country. Our study revealed that pharmacists' involvement could not only greatly increase the reporting rate but also quality reporting. 

Authors (4)

sriram shanmugam

College of Pharmacy,SRIPMS,Coi...

View all publications →

Nair NK Narayanankutty

JSS College of Pharmacy, Ooty

View all publications →

Senthilvel Nagamanickam

Sri Ramakrishna Hospital ,Coim...

View all publications →

Merin Levy Philip

College of Pharmacy,SRIPMS,Coi...

View all publications →

Download Article

PDF

Best for printing and citation

File size: 0.0 MB
Format: PDF

Download Article

PDF

Best for printing and citation

File size: 0.0 MB
Format: PDF

Article Information

BJMHR0309009

BJMHR-03-000009

2016-09-01

Article Impact

Views:3,334
Downloads:1,512

How to Cite

shanmugam & NK, N. & Nagamanickam & Levy, M. (2016). STUDY ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT AT A PRIVATE CORPORATE HOSPITAL. British Journal of Medical and Health Research, 3(9), xx-xx. https://bjmhr.com/articles/BJMHR0309009

Article Actions