e-ISSN: 2394-2967
logo

British Journal of Medical and Health Research

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers: Special Issue on Medical and Health Research – Submit to British Journal (BJMHR) by March 31, 2026

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers: Special Issue on Medical and Health Research – Submit to British Journal (BJMHR) by March 31, 2026

Volume 5, Issue 12 - 2018 (December 2018 Issue 12)

Volume 5 Issue 12 Cover

Issue Details:

Volume 5 Issue 12
Published:Invalid Date

Editorial: December 2018 Issue 12

Welcome to the 2018 issue of British Journal of Medical and Health Research. This issue showcases the remarkable breadth and depth of contemporary research across multiple disciplines. From cutting-edge applications of machine learning in climate science to the revolutionary potential of quantum computing in drug discovery, our featured articles demonstrate the power of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing global challenges.

We are particularly excited to present research that bridges traditional academic boundaries, reflecting our journal's commitment to fostering innovation through cross-disciplinary dialogue. The integration of artificial intelligence with environmental science, the application of blockchain technology to supply chain management, and the convergence of urban planning with smart city technologies exemplify the transformative potential of collaborative research.

As we continue to navigate an era of rapid technological advancement and global challenges, the research presented in this issue offers both insights and solutions that will shape our future. We thank our authors, reviewers, and editorial board members for their continued dedication to advancing knowledge and promoting scientific excellence.

Dr Hemangi J Patel
Editor-in-Chief
British Journal of Medical and Health Research

Articles in This Issue

Showing 2 of 2 articles
Research PaperID: BJMHR0512001

Diagnostic Utility of Complexed Prostate-specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in Nigerian Men

Eyam Sunday Eyam, Edet E. Ikpi, Egbuagha Ephraim U, Okhormhe Zibril A, Azinge Elaine Chinyelu, Bolarin Debayo M

We evaluate the diagnostic utility of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) in the early biochemical detection of Prostate Cancer among Nigerian men in Calabar. This was a cross sectional descriptive study involving one hundred and twenty (120) male participants, in two groups of sixty, consecutively recruited from the Urology clinic within a one year period following approval from the Health Research Ethics Committee of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital. The first group of sixty (60) of the patients were clinically and histologically confirmed to have prostate cancer (PCa) and were treatment naive. While the second group of sixty (60) patients also clinically and histologically confirmed to have benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were used as controls. Participants were between 50 and 80 years old. Sera were analyzed for complexed and total PSA using WKEA ELISA kits and read with STAT FAX 2100 micro plate reader. Values of complexed PSA were higher in prostate cancer than in BPH, with median values of 15.8 ng/mL and 0.9 ng/mL, respectively (P = .001). Similarly, median values of total PSA were higher in PCa (19.3 ng/mL) than in BPH (8.4 ng/mL), P = .001. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses showed area under the curve (AUC) for cPSA to be 0.575, with a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 62.7% at a cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, while tPSA had AUC of 0.735, sensitivity of 75.7% and specificity of 64.4% at a different and higher cutoff above 10.0 ng/mL. Complexed and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) though both sensitive and specific for the biochemical prediction of prostate cancer have some variability with Complexed PSA being an early predictor of prostate cancer than total PSA. This is because complexed PSA was able to detect prostate cancer at very low cutoff value (1.0 ng/mL) when compared to tPSA that was able to detect prostate cancer at a higher cutoff value (>10.0 ng/mL) among Nigerian men. Therefore, complexed PSA is a good biomarker for early biochemical prediction of prostate cancer disease in Nigerian African men when total PSA levels are subclinical.

Complexed PSAtotal PSAearly diagnosisprostate cancerNigerian men.
32,410 views
9,709 downloads

Contributors:

 Eyam Sunday Eyam
,
 Edet E. Ikpi
,
 Egbuagha Ephraim U
,
 Okhormhe Zibril A
,
 Azinge Elaine Chinyelu
,
 Bolarin Debayo M
Research PaperID: BJMHR0512002

Medical Undergraduates Preference in Learning Style: PowerPoint presentations versus chalk and talk

Anil Kumar, Anil Kumar, Nasser Salem Al-Nazwani, SHIVARAJ GOWDA

Learning style preferences are the manner and conditions under which learners most efficiently and effectively perceive process, store, and recall what they are attempting to learn. Lectures have been the most common form of teaching and learning since ancient times. The most common ways of lecture delivery include the lectures using PowerPoint (PPT) presentations, lectures utilizing the transparency and overhead projector (TOHP) besides the traditional ‘chalk and talk’ method. Didactic lectures are still the most commonly used methodology of teaching. The objective of the study is to compare PowerPoint presentations versus chalk and talk in material understanding, effectiveness and attitude among medical students. A cross sectional questionnaire based study was conducted on 3rd year medical students of College of Medicine and Health Science, NUST, Sohar. The study participant was divided into two groups. The first groups of students were taught on the black board (chalk and talk) and the second groups of students were taught on PPT presentation. The same biochemistry topics were taught to both groups by the same instructor and on the scheduled time and day. A questionnaire was designed to assess the opinion of students regarding black board and PPT presentation. A predesigned and pretested questionnaire containing 12 questions was given to the students at the end of the lecture. The participation in the present study was on voluntary basis. In this study, PPT teaching was the most preferred teaching aid (60.23%) compared to black board teaching method (46.38%). Majority of the students reported well prepared and organized lectures, more subject coverage, and better demonstrations of clinical conditions is seen in PPT teaching then black board teaching. PPT presentation teaching is the best preferred teaching aid, which can be supplemented by Blackboard for better understanding.

LecturesPowerPointPresentationsChalk and talkBlack boardDidactic lectures
32,567 views
9,867 downloads

Contributors:

 Anil Kumar
,
 Anil Kumar
,
 Nasser Salem Al-Nazwani
,
 SHIVARAJ GOWDA