Archive : Volume - 11, Issue - 9, Month - September
1 Influence Of Local Anesthetics On Wound Healing
- Marcio Grande Carstens* ,
- Jurandir Marcondes Ribas-Filho ,
- Claudio Luciano Franck ,
- Nicolau Gregori Czeczko
- Abstract
- Show Article
- Download : 28
- Certificate
Abstract : ABSTRACT
Evaluating the scarring differences between areas previously anesthetized with different local anesthetics is interesting to verify whether the choice of anesthetic helps in surgical healing in relation to inflammation, neovascularization and collagen deposition. To analyze the influence of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine on the inflammatory phase of surgical incision healing. Thirty male Wistar rats were divided into 3 groups to evaluate the effects of these local anesthetics in comparison with each other and with a control group. The animals were subjected to general anesthesia and subsequently scheduled for administration of the solutions and their samples were excised after 5 days. The scar area, neovascularization and collagen deposition were studied. Regarding inflammation and neovascularization, there were no significant differences between the groups, with all of them presenting pronounced levels. As for collagen deposition, this group exhibited significantly higher levels of type i, ii, and iii collagens compared to groups c and r. Regarding collagen deposition, this group demonstrated significantly higher levels of type i, ii and iii collagen when compared to groups c and r. No differences were observed between the groups in relation to the variation in scar measurements, inflammation and neovascularization. However, there was a significant difference in the production of collagens with an intensity of 6 to 12 times greater in collagen types i, ii and iii with the use of levobupivacaine.
Keywords: Local anesthetics. Wound healing. Neovascularization. Collagen. Levobupivacaine. Ropivacaine.
Keyword : Local anesthetics. Wound healing. Neovascularization. Collagen. Levobupivacaine. Ropivacaine.
3 Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Filling Quality Using Various obturation Techniques and Different Sealers: An In vitro CBCT Study
- Dr. Arun Rathod J* ,
- Dr. S. Anitha Rao ,
- Dr. V. Chandrasekhar ,
- Dr. Shaik Sana
- Abstract
- Show Article
- Download : 12
- Certificate
Abstract : ABSTRACT
A three dimensional well fitted root canal prevents percolation and micro leakage of periapical exudates into the root canal space, prevents reinfection, and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to occur. Voids created between the sealer and root canal wall possess difficulties in bonding and leads to endodontic failure. This study aimed to evaluated the root canal filling quality using different obturation techniques with different root canal sealers using CBCT. Sixty single rooted premolars were collected and standardized to a length of 12mm, instrumented and grouped into 2 groups based on obturation techniques employed as Group I- Single cone obturation, Group II- Lateral condensation technique and are further divided into 3 subgroups in each based on various sealers employed- AH plus, MTA Fillapex and i Root SP and quality of obturation (voids determination) was performed under CBCT. Among the tested groups single cone technique iRoot SP showed least number of voids and highest number of voids are seen in lateral compaction technique AH Plus. In LC technique least number of voids are seen with respect to i Root SP and highest for AH Plus sealer. In single cone technique least number of voids are seen with respect to iRoot SP and highest number of voids are seen in AH Plus sealer group.
Keywords: AH plus sealer, MTA Fillapex, i Root SP, Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Keyword : AH plus sealer, MTA Fillapex, i Root SP, Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Login
Loading....
Author Guideline
Copyright Form
News Update
Archive List
- Volume-11
- Volume-10
- January 2023 Issue 1
- January 2023 Issue 1
- February 2023 Issue 2
- March 2023 Issue 3
- March 2023 Issue 3
- April 2023 Issue 4
- April 2023 Issue 4
- May 2023 Issue 5
- May 2023 Issue 5
- May 2023 Issue 5
- June 2023 Issue 6
- June 2023 Issue 6
- July 2023 Issue 7
- July 2023 Issue 7
- August 2023 Issue 8
- August 2023 Issue 8
- September 2023 Issue 9
- October 2023 Issue 10
- November 2023 Issue 11
- December 2023 Issue 12
- Volume-9
- January 2022 Issue 1
- February 2022 Issue 2
- March 2022 Issue 3
- April 2022 Issue 4
- May 2022 Issue 5
- June 2022 Issue 6
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- August 2022 Issue 8
- September 2022 Issue 9
- October 2022 Issue 10
- October 2022 Issue 10
- November 2022 Issue 11
- November 2022 Issue 11
- November 2022 Issue 11
- December 2022 Issue 12
- Volume-8
- January 2021 Issue 1
- February 2021 Issue 2
- February 2021 Issue 2
- March 2021 Issue 3
- April 2021 Issue 4
- May 2021 Issue 5
- June 2021 Issue 6
- June 2021 Issue 6
- June 2021 Issue 6
- July 2021 Issue 7
- August 2021 Issue 8
- September 2021 Issue 9
- October 2021 Issue 10
- November 2021 Issue 11
- December 2021 Issue 12
- Volume-7
- January 2020 Issue 1
- January 2020 Issue 1
- February 2020 Issue 2
- March 2020 Issue 3
- March 2020 Issue 3
- March 2020 Issue 3
- April 2020 Issue 4
- April 2020 Issue 4
- May 2020 Issue 5
- May 2020 Issue 5
- May 2020 Issue 5
- June 2020 Issue 6
- June 2020 Issue 6
- June 2020 Issue 6
- July 2020 Issue 7
- August 2020 Issue 8
- September 2020 Issue 9
- October 2020 Issue 10
- November 2020 Issue 11
- December 2020 Issue 12
- December 2020 Issue 12
- Volume-6
- January 2019 Issue 1
- February 2019 Issue 2
- March 2019 Issue 3
- April 2019 Issue 4
- April 2019 Issue 4
- May 2019 Issue 5
- May 2019 Issue 5
- June 2019 Issue 6
- June 2019 Issue 6
- July 2019 Issue 7
- July 2019 Issue 7
- August 2019 Issue 8
- September 2019 Issue 9
- September 2019 Issue 9
- September 2019 Issue 9
- October 2019 Issue 10
- November 2019 Issue 11
- November 2019 Issue 11
- November 2019 Issue 11
- December 2019 Issue 12
- Volume-5
- January 2018 Issue 1
- January 2018 Issue 1
- February 2018 Issue 2
- March 2018 Issue 3
- April 2018 Issue 4
- May 2018 Issue 5
- June 2018 Issue 6
- July 2018 Issue 7
- August 2018 Issue 8
- September 2018 Issue 9
- September 2018 Issue 9
- October 2018 Issue 10
- October 2018 Issue 10
- November 2018 Issue 11
- December 2018 Issue 12
- December 2018 Issue 12
- Volume-4
- January 2017 Issue 1
- February 2017 Issue 2
- February 2017 Issue 2
- March 2017 Issue 3
- April 2017 Issue 4
- April 2017 Issue 4
- May 2017 Issue 5
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- July 2017 Issue 7
- August 2017 Issue 8
- August 2017 Issue 8
- September 2017 Issue 9
- October 2017 Issue 10
- November 2017 Issue 11
- December 2017 Issue 12
- December 2017 Issue 12
- December 2017 Issue 12
- Volume-3
- January 2016 Issue 1
- February 2016 Issue 2
- March 2016 Issue 3
- April 2016 Issue 4
- May 2016 Issue 5
- June 2016 Issue 6
- June 2016 Issue 6
- July 2016 Issue 7
- July 2016 Issue 7
- July 2016 Issue 7
- August 2016 Issue 8
- September 2016 Issue 9
- October 2016 Issue 10
- October 2016 Issue 10
- November 2016 Issue 11
- November 2016 Issue 11
- December 2016 Issue 12
- Volume-2
- Volume-1
Statastics
Download of Articles
101,602